Artículo de Actualización

The potential role of intracoronary imaging at the dawn of the fourth revolution in Interventional Cardiology

Nico Bruining, Elzbieta Pociask, Klaudia Proniewska

Revista Argentina de Cardioangiología 2017;(01):0015-0022 

Intracoronary imaging techniques, such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and more recently optical coherence tomography (OCT), have been used intensively for research, treatment planning and guidance. During the last 2 decades they presented information concerning the process of atherosclerosis and the efficacy of new pharmaceutical and interventional treatment methods amongst which the bare metal stents, drug-eluting stents and now the bioabsorbable scaffolds. Intracoronary imaging methods have shown to be indispensable tools evaluating new therapies.
The question could be raised: what could be the potential role of the intracoronary imaging methods at the dawn of the so-called 4th revolution in interventional cardiology? Here it is important to select the most appropriate evaluation method(s) to observe the efficacy of these new platforms by studying the scaffold degradation, the bioabsorption process and ultimately vessel healing. Standard coronary angiography alone is not sufficient enough and thus intracoronary imaging methods such as IVUS and OCT are crucial additional imaging tools. Both IVUS and OCT have their particular advantages and disadvantages making them more complementary than competitors.

Palabras clave: cardiovascular imaging, intravascular ultrasound, optimal coherence tomography, virtual histology,

Las técnicas de imagen coronaria intracoronaria, tales como el ultrasonido intravascular (IVUS) y más recientemente la tomografía de coherencia óptica (OCT) han sido utilizadas de manera intensiva para la investigación, tratamiento, planificación y guía. Durante las últimas dos décadas éstas técnicas permitieron presentar información acerca del proceso de la aterosclerosis y la eficacia de nuevos tratamientos farmacológicos e intervencionistas entre los cuales se encontraron los stents convencionales, lo liberadores de droga y aquellos con polímero biodegradable. Los métodos de imagen intracoronaria mostraron ser una herramienta indispensable para evaluar estas nuevas terapias.
La pregunta que puede realizarse es: ¿Cumplen los métodos de imágenes intracoronaria un rol en el amanecer de la llamada 4 revolución en la Cardiología Intervencionista? Es importante aquí elegir el método más apropiado para evaluar la eficacia de estas nuevas plataformas estudiando la degradación del polímero, el proceso de bioabsorción y, últimamente, la “cura” del vaso. La angiografía coronaria estándar por si sola no es suficiente, por lo que métodos de imagen intracoronaria como el IVUS y la OCT son cruciales herramientas adicionales. Ambos, IVUS y OCT, tienen sus ventajas y desventajas particulares, por lo que parecen complementarse y no competir entre sí.

Keywords: ultrasonido intravascular, tomografía de coherencia coronaria, imágenes intravasculares, histología virtual,

Los autores declaran no poseer conflictos de intereses.

Fuente de información Colegio Argentino de Cardioangiólogos Intervencionistas. Para solicitudes de reimpresión a Revista Argentina de Cardioangiología intervencionista hacer click aquí.

Recibido 2015-12-04 | Aceptado 2015-12-04 | Publicado 2016-04-01

Tabla 1. Intravascular detection of vulnerable plaque.

Tabla 2. Scaffolds measurements in different imaging modalities.

Figura 1. Panel A shows the angiographic image of an LAD. The two dashed lines indicate an...

Figura 2. Panels A and B are showing the left coronary artery detected by a software...

Figura 3. Panel A shows a cross-sectional OCT image of a PLLA scaffold (BVS stent) and in...

Figura 4. In panels A, B, C and D an IVUS cross-sectional image is presented of a BVS stent...



What is the additional value and potential role of intracoronary imaging within coronary interventions today? During the recent years we witnessed a sort of competition between different available cardiovascular imaging techniques to become the next reference method in diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease. The need to get a more in-depth understanding about the atherosclerotic process was one of the triggers of this competition as some of the imaging methods, and derived quantitative tools, promised to be able to identify coronary plaques at risk, of which results could contribute to optimize treatment.

While coronary angiography is still the gold standard in daily clinical practice, intracoronary imaging techniques such as intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and more recently optical coherence tomography (OCT) brought great additional values making them extremely useful devices, sometimes even crucial, in making treatment decisions and for evaluation of the given treatment.

Coronary angiography presents the complete coronary artery tree including the tortuosity of the vessels, however, its major limitations are possible foreshortening1 of coronary lesions and the fact that it visualizes the lumen only, which could hide possible present problems within diffuse diseased arteries2. Coronary angiography is not a sufficient method to provide in-depth knowledge of coronary artery disease and to show in detail plaque progression or regression unlike the cross-sectional based intracoronary imaging modalities as IVUS3,4 (Figure 1) or OCT5,6. These two modalities can be used for visualization and quantification of atherosclerotic lesions, plaque ruptures, presence of thrombosis and guidance of stent implantation7. The development of semi-automated analysis software tools for quantitative assessment8 enhanced both IVUS and OCT into clinical studies evaluating new pharmaceutical therapies and new stent platforms as by example the recently introduced bioabsorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS)9,10, sometimes referred to be the possible 4th treatment revolution in interventional cardiology.

In the era of the stents implantation with bioabsorbable polymers and the bioabsorbable scaffolds, which hopefully overcome the problems of drug-eluting stents (DES) with permanent polymers, there are a lot of questions that need to be addressed. Are bioabsorbable scaffolds a hope for treating vulnerable plaque?

Do bioabsorbable polymers for DES decrease the risks of very late stent thrombosis and the complexities of dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) use in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients? Do the bioabsorbable scaffolds give long enough mechanical support to allow the vessel healing? Do they deliver their drugs efficiently to stop progression of disease at the treated segment? How long do they stay in the scaffolded lesion? Is there any residue in the vessel wall and if so, what kind and how does it interact with the vessel wall?

Some of these questions need to be addressed evaluating these particular interventional treatment methods. Both IVUS and OCT are playing an important role and this short review briefly discusses their potential in the rapidly evolving field of percutaneous coronary interventions and imaging.



Intracoronary imaging has opened new avenues of opportunity in the recognition and better understanding of the role of atherosclerotic lesions. All types of atherosclerotic plaques with high thrombotic risk and rapid progression should be treated as vulnerable plaques11. Different types of vulnerable plaques cause acute coronary events and sudden cardiac death. The vulnerable plaques could be differentiated based on morphology and activity imaging. Similar morphology plaques in diagnostic imaging might look very different using methods of detecting activity and physiology of these plaques. However, intracoronary imaging (IVUS and OCT) as a complementary techniques are very useful in identifying high risk plaques, by evaluating characteristic structures (Table 1). It is very important to better understand the evolution path of atherosclerosis toward a vulnerable state so that we can find out how long these plaques will stay vulnerable, how to protect plaques from becoming vulnerable and how to treat vulnerable plaque.




The success of stenting vulnerable plaque depends on many variables: the stent type, its properties as platform, flexibility, and radial strength; the location, configuration and properties of target lesion, plaque morphology. As described-above, intracoronary imaging complements coronary angiography by presenting detailed information about the coronary vessel wall and plaque morphology. Furthermore, they are helpful during an intervention by assessing stent deployment, its expansion and by showing possible malapposition post-implantation. It has been reported that suboptimal stent/scaffold selection and deployment could be associated with increased risks of possible restenosis and thrombosis. Accurate stent/scaffold sizing, for which the quantitative analysis results of IVUS/OCT images can be used on-line, is thus very important, if not crucial, for the direct and long-term outcome of the provided treatment12. Proper sizing of the new bioabsorbable scaffolds is even more important as compared to permanent metallic platforms due to possible problems related to particular backbone materials used for the scaffolds such as scaffold elongation and even fractures if the selected scaffold is not of the “appropriate” size13,14.

With respect to the scaffolds, both IVUS and OCT are capable to present information about the dimensional changes, strut covering by endothelization and vessel remodeling over the time leading to a better understanding of the vessel response to the implanted scaffold15,16. An overview of the additional values of the IVUS and OCT are collected in Table 2.

Recently, several studies reported the use of IVUS as well as OCT to determine the influence of lesion preparation using different balloon sizes, e.g. pre-dilatation, on final stent expansion, where the selection of balloon and its size was based on IVUS or OCT assessment17. Stent expansion remains an important predictor of later possible restenosis and of sub-acute thrombosis12. It has been suggested that bioabsorbable scaffolds made of poly-l-lactic-acid (PLLA) have higher chances of adapting more gently to the vessel wall by allowing some deformation during implantation. Intracoronary imaging allows to address this by providing a comprehensive presentation of the stent geometry after implantation18. Azarnoush et al., used OCT to evaluate whether it could be applied for visualizing possible deformation of coronary vessels under the influence of the balloon inflation using it in a phantom model19. Muraoka et al., present the effects of IVUS-guided adjunctive high-pressure non-compliant balloon post-dilation after DES implantation in improving DES expansion safely20, which implies that intracoronary imaging not only plays a role in stent or scaffold development but also in evaluating the treatment strategy. Taking into account that currently many different bioabsorbable scaffold platforms are under development, or have already entered the phase of clinical trials, it is crucial to appropriately investigate every aspect in the treatment procedure.




Stent implantation in complex geometries, configurations as coronary bifurcations, is a challenging clinical problem, with a high rate of procedural complications21. The most common treatment strategy of atherosclerosis in coronary bifurcation is implantation a stent in the main branch and dilatation of the side branch passing through the struts of the stent at the bifurcation. Iakovou et al described different techniques of stenting a bifurcation22. Fusion of OCT and angiography and 3D vessel reconstruction could help cardiologist precisely assessing the size of side-branch, side-branch angles, lesion location what is important choosing treatment strategy. Bifurcation stenting techniques with metallic stents have been extensively studied but at the dawn of the 4th revolution, there are still no data how to treat bifurcations with bioabsorption scaffolds. The potential success of BVS implantation at side-branches is associated with disappearance of jailing struts. Dzavik and Colombo presented the feasibility of performing contemporary bifurcation techniques BVS23. Available stenting procedures (T-stenting, crush and culotte procedures) were performed in a synthetic arterial model. The study showed that BVS is recommended in provisional stenting with balloon inflation and 2-BVS, T-stent technique in a high-angle bifurcation. In other techniques, DES are preferable. Karanasos et al. demonstrated results of implanting BVS in ostial side-branch lesions24. In these cases, 3D vessel reconstruction based on fusion of OCT and Angiography was helpful to investigate the patterns of flow distribution at the follow up and their potential implications regarding ‘neo-carina’ formation. ‘Neo-carina’ formation could have adverse consequences by acting on flow distribution and possible protrusion in the main-branch. Presented cases suggest the possible contribution of bifurcation angle in determining the extent of ‘neo-carina’ formation and showed how important it is to investigate and understand the mechanism of neo-carina formation and its impact on treatment strategy selection in bifurcation lesions. Grundeken et al25 in their study using 3D OCT reconstructions showed results of a new treatment strategy in complex bifurcation lesions with side branches > 2 mm using Tryton stent in combination with the BVS.

The above-mentioned examples showed the important role of intravascular imaging in studying stent platforms and new techniques. They also show that we still need to develop a new tool which will be able to optimize interventions. Gastaldi26 demonstrated numerical models to analyze through the finite element method the stent behavior in applications involving coronary bifurcations. He showed promising results indicating the direction to developing novel computer methodologies, which will give the capability of analyzing different stenting techniques. In the future computer models, simulations will increase technical knowledge to allow stent designers to obtain information for the optimization of the devices used in bifurcations and clinicians to have some patients-specific proposal for intervention planning.



Intracoronary imaging is able to show tissue coverage of implanted devices. It is important to gain knowledge what exactly stimulates process of vessel healing. It has been shown that endothelial shear stress (ESS) is an important biomechanical parameter in the prediction of the localization of neointimal formation. Bourantas et al.27 reported a study that applies a fusion between IVUS and/or OCT and coronary angiography to examine in-depth the effects of ESS on neointimal formation and showes that there is a correlation between ESS and neointimal thickness after BVS implantation. They found that, in contrast to the native segments, in scaffolded and stented segments a thick layer of tissue developed over lipid and calcific tissues making plaque more stable and in BVS the neointima developed slowly.

These types of studies are combining coronary lumen and plaque morphology information derived by intracoronary imaging and integrate that with coronary vessel tortuosity information derived from bi-plane angiography (or even rotational angiography), which allows to create a true three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the coronary vasculature (Figure 2).

Some of these studies in this area also provided information concerning the fact that the stent geometry and the shape of the struts, e.g. their thickness, determines local ESS27 28. Different local ESS resulted into an increased neointimal growth in-between the stent struts and a reduced neointimal coverage on top of the struts. It looks like that multi-modality imaging by integration of IVUS, OCT and angiography to assess the hemodynamic microenvironment in stented or scaffolded segments may be a very potential tool to investigate in-vivo the pro-restenotic and pro-thrombotic implications of different stent/scaffold designs29.




Bioabsorbable scaffolds are a novel addition to the treatment options for the interventionist and have been developed with the intention to provide temporary lumen scaffolding without the disadvantages of a permanent implanted metallic device. Ideally, degradable implants should offer a better biocompatibility, a limited permanent longitudinal and radial straightening effect onto the coronary vessel and the possibility for vessel growth and late positive remodeling. Currently, there are two types of the main backbone components used for bioabsorbable scaffolds: 1) polymer-based, such as the PLLA; and 2) metallic-based scaffolds applying magnesium30.

The exact nature of the degradation and the bioresorption process is still not yet fully understood, especially in the clinical setting. This process shows a difference in duration and “behavior” between the two most used backbone materials being polymers or magnesium. To evaluate these differences in-vivo only imaging can be applied, histology is obviously out of the question, and this novel task showed to be very challenging as the two materials do appear visually very much different in all possible applied imaging methods31-33. Both the magnesium and the polymeric based scaffolds are radiolucent and therefore not visible on angiography, performing quantitative coronary angiography is thus a difficult task34. The magnesium struts are visualized in IVUS images as bright structures at post-implant, almost similar to those of “regular” metallic based stents. In OCT images they appear as bright highly reflective structures with a shadow trail, an appearance often used by semi-automated quantitative computer algorithms for detection35. In contrast, polymeric struts in IVUS show, at post-implant, two thick lines indicating when 40MHz catheters are applied and one big bright spot when a 20MHz catheters is used due to an echogenic “blooming” effect. OCT visualizes polymeric struts, also at post-implant, as a light scattering box with a black central core, without the typical shadowing as observed behind metallic stent struts10, 36 (Figure 3). Over time these visual appearances are changing drastically due to the degradation of the material and the further bioresorption process in both the IVUS images as well as within the of OCT. Some of these changes can be quantified and could possibly shed some light into the behavior of the scaffolds in-vivo post-implantation and could perhaps be the link between the ex-vivo bench degradation results37.

An automated quantitative differential echogenicity analysis software tool was applied to quantify the changes in IVUS image properties of both the PLLA as well as the magnesium based scaffold platform, showing promising results37,38. In this method the adventitia, known to contain fibrotic tissue components, is used as a discriminator between hypo- and hyperechogenic tissue components found between the lumen-intima and the external elastic membrane area (e.g. the plaque). After scaffold implantation the amount of hyperechogenic tissue components within the scaffolded plaque area immediately increases. During the degradation and bioresorption process the morphology of the struts changes, which ultimately results in a diminishing gray-level intensity of the struts within the IVUS images36 (Figure 4). It looks like that quantitative differential echogenicity could so be applied as a possible surrogate to quantify the bioresorption process in-vivo, assuming that the decrease in echogenicity parallels stent degradation. The same method was also applied to evaluate the resorption process of the magnesium scaffold platform39.

Another study proposes to quantify the bioabsorption process by applying the commercially available IVUS-Virtual Histology (IVUS-VH, Volcano Corporation, Rancho Cordova, CA, USA) analysis tool, exploring more in-depth the raw IVUS radiofrequency data, using the so-called Shin’s method40. This method classifies the scaffold struts as calcium surrounded by a layer of necrotic core, which is expected to diminish both over time during the strut degradation. These longitudinal changes in necrotic core and dense calcium content could perhaps also be used as surrogates to monitor the bioabsorption process in-vivo41. Nevertheless, to date it seems that differential echogenicity could be the most promising method to observe the bioabsorption process of scaffolds in humans41. An automated quantitative resorption analysis tool for OCT has not been proposed yet. However, as this field is still in its infancy, further studies linking the bench identified degradation details to the in-vivo bioabsorption measurements is highly desirable.




Currently, there are IVUS and OCT systems available with incorporated analysis tools for semi-automated quantification of dimensional parameters. Although, there are still promising developments announced such as higher ultrasound frequencies (>50MHz) theoretically improving the IVUS image resolution and second-harmonic imaging42, in the era of the bioabsorbable scaffolds there is a strong need for new and improved additional software tools which might enhance the clinical value of intracoronary imaging techniques in daily practice.




Recent study demonstrated that true quantitative 3D analysis of coronary angiography more reliably assessed segment lengths and diameters43. However, it still has the same limitations in assessing early stages of coronary plaque development and is not able to identify possible vulnerable plaques or locations. Three-dimensional computational methods to evaluate the distribution and growth of in-stent neointimal tissue applying OCT imaging, might be an interesting and useful tool44 and, if in real-time, could even be helpful for on-line guidance of complex interventional procedures.




Quantitative automated tools to assess plaque composition by IVUS have been proposed of which some are commercially available as earlier described. These tools have been applied to quantify the degradation process of the bioresorbable scaffolds by assessing plaque compositional changes which could be used as a surrogate to identify the degradation of the scaffolds. With respect to OCT, the identification of the coronary plaque morphology is mostly performed qualitatively. This time consuming process, including possible inter- and intra-observer related deviations, could be overcome by application of automated tools, of which methods one was recently proposed45. In addition to this development, automated or semi-automated algorithms assessing neoatheroslerosis in bioabsorbable scaffolds could be another valuable additional tool.

  1. Waller BF, Pinkerton CA, Slack JD. Intravascular ultrasound: A histological study of vessels during life. The new ‘gold standard’ for vascular imaging. Circulation. 1992;85:2305-2310

  2. Suh WM, Seto AH, Margey RJ, Cruz-Gonzalez I, Jang IK. Intravascular detection of the vulnerable plaque. Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging. 2011;4:169-178

  3. Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS, Mehran R, McPherson J, Farhat N, Marso SP, Parise H, Templin B, White R, Zhang Z, Serruys PW, Investigators P. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. The New England journal of medicine. 2011;364:226-235

  4. Sharif F, Murphy RT. Current status of vulnerable plaque detection. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2010;75:135-144

  5. Kume T, Akasaka T, Kawamoto T, Watanabe N, Toyota E, Neishi Y, Sukmawan R, Sadahira Y, Yoshida K. Assessment of coronary arterial plaque by optical coherence tomography. The American journal of cardiology. 2006;97:1172-1175

  6. Prati F, Zimarino M, Stabile E, Pizzicannella G, Fouad T, Rabozzi R, Filippini A, Pizzicannella J, Cera M, De Caterina R. Does optical coherence tomography identify arterial healing after stenting? An in vivo comparison with histology, in a rabbit carotid model. Heart. 2008;94:217-221

  7. Bezerra HG, Costa MA, Guagliumi G, Rollins AM, Simon DI. Intracoronary optical coherence tomography: A comprehensive review clinical and research applications. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. 2009;2:1035-1046

  8. von Birgelen C, de Feyter PJ, de Vrey EA, Li W, Bruining N, Nicosia A, Roelandt JR, Serruys PW. Simpson’s rule for the volumetric ultrasound assessment of atherosclerotic coronary arteries: A study with ecg-gated three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound. Coronary artery disease. 1997;8:363-369

  9. Brugaletta S, Costa JR, Jr., Garcia-Garcia HM. Assessment of drug-eluting stents and bioresorbable stents by grayscale ivus and ivus-based imaging modalities. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging. 2011;27:239-248

  10. Gogas BD, Radu M, Onuma Y, Perkins L, Powers JC, Gomez-Lara J, Farooq V, Garcia-Garcia HM, Diletti R, Rapoza R, Virmani R, Serruys PW. Evaluation with in vivo optical coherence tomography and histology of the vascular effects of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold at two years following implantation in a healthy porcine coronary artery model: Implications of pilot results for future pre-clinical studies. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging. 2012;28:499-511

  11. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, Badimon JJ, Stefanadis C, Moreno P, Pasterkamp G, Fayad Z, Stone PH, Waxman S, Raggi P, Madjid M, Zarrabi A, Burke A, Yuan C, Fitzgerald PJ, Siscovick DS, de Korte CL, Aikawa M, Juhani Airaksinen KE, Assmann G, Becker CR, Chesebro JH, Farb A, Galis ZS, Jackson C, Jang IK, Koenig W, Lodder RA, March K, Demirovic J, Navab M, Priori SG, Rekhter MD, Bahr R, Grundy SM, Mehran R, Colombo A, Boerwinkle E, Ballantyne C, Insull W, Jr., Schwartz RS, Vogel R, Serruys PW, Hansson GK, Faxon DP, Kaul S, Drexler H, Greenland P, Muller JE, Virmani R, Ridker PM, Zipes DP, Shah PK, Willerson JT. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: A call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part i. Circulation. 2003;108:1664-1672

  12. Costa MA, Angiolillo DJ, Tannenbaum M, Driesman M, Chu A, Patterson J, Kuehl W, Battaglia J, Dabbons S, Shamoon F, Flieshman B, Niederman A, Bass TA, Investigators S. Impact of stent deployment procedural factors on long-term effectiveness and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (final results of the multicenter prospective stllr trial). The American journal of cardiology. 2008;101:1704-1711

  13. Park SM, Kim JY, Hong BK, Lee BK, Min PK, Rim S, Mun HS, Kwon SW, Lee SJ, Park JK, Kwon HM. Predictors of stent fracture in patients treated with closed-cell design stents: Sirolimus-eluting stent and its bare-metal counterpart, the bx velocity stent. Coronary artery disease. 2011;22:40-44

  14. Garcia-Garcia HM, Serruys PW, Campos CM, Onuma Y. Differential impact of five coronary devices on plaque size: Insights from the absorb and spirit trials. International journal of cardiology. 2014;175:441-445

  15. Lane JP, Perkins LE, Sheehy AJ, Pacheco EJ, Frie MP, Lambert BJ, Rapoza RJ, Virmani R. Lumen gain and restoration of pulsatility after implantation of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold in porcine coronary arteries. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. 2014;7:688-695

  16. Tamburino C, Latib A, van Geuns RJ, Sabate M, Mehilli J, Gori T, Achenbach S, Alvarez MP, Nef H, Lesiak M, Di Mario C, Colombo A, Naber CK, Caramanno G, Capranzano P, Brugaletta S, Geraci S, Araszkiewicz A, Mattesini A, Pyxaras SA, Rzeszutko L, Depukat R, Diletti R, Boone E, Capodanno D, Dudek D. Contemporary practice and technical aspects in coronary intervention with bioresorbable scaffolds: A european perspective. EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2015;11:45-52

  17. Blackman DJ, Porto I, Shirodaria C, Channon KM, Banning AP. Usefulness of high-pressure post-dilatation to optimize deployment of drug-eluting stents for the treatment of diffuse in-stent coronary restenosis. The American journal of cardiology. 2004;94:922-925

  18. Okamura T, Onuma Y, Garcia-Garcia HM, Regar E, Wykrzykowska JJ, Koolen J, Thuesen L, Windecker S, Whitbourn R, McClean DR, Ormiston JA, Serruys PW, Investigators ACB. 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography assessment of jailed side branches by bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: A proposal for classification. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. 2010;3:836-844

  19. Azarnoush H, Vergnole S, Pazos V, Bisaillon CE, Boulet B, Lamouche G. Intravascular optical coherence tomography to characterize tissue deformation during angioplasty: Preliminary experiments with artery phantoms. Journal of biomedical optics. 2012;17:96015-96011

  20. Muraoka Y, Sonoda S, Tsuda Y, Tanaka S, Okazaki M, Otsuji Y. Effect of intravascular ultrasound-guided adjuvant high-pressure non-compliant balloon post-dilation after drug-eluting stent implantation. Heart and vessels. 2011;26:565-571

  21. Colombo A, Moses JW, Morice MC, Ludwig J, Holmes DR, Jr., Spanos V, Louvard Y, Desmedt B, Di Mario C, Leon MB. Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus-eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions. Circulation. 2004;109:1244-1249

  22. Iakovou I, Ge L, Colombo A. Contemporary stent treatment of coronary bifurcations. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2005;46:1446-1455

  23. Dzavik V, Colombo A. The absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold in coronary bifurcations: Insights from bench testing. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. 2014;7:81-88

  24. Karanasos A, Li Y, Tu S, Wentzel JJ, Reiber JH, van Geuns RJ, Regar E. Is it safe to implant bioresorbable scaffolds in ostial side-branch lesions? Impact of ‘neo-carina’ formation on main-branch flow pattern. Longitudinal clinical observations. Atherosclerosis. 2015;238:22-25

  25. Grundeken MJ, Hassell ME, Kraak RP, de Bruin DM, Koch KT, Henriques JP, van Leeuwen TG, Tijssen JG, Piek JJ, de Winter RJ, Wykrzykowska JJ. Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions with the absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold in combination with the tryton dedicated coronary bifurcation stent: Evaluation using two- and three-dimensional optical coherence tomography. EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2014

  26. Gastaldi D, Morlacchi S, Nichetti R, Capelli C, Dubini G, Petrini L, Migliavacca F. Modelling of the provisional side-branch stenting approach for the treatment of atherosclerotic coronary bifurcations: Effects of stent positioning. Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology. 2010;9:551-561

  27. Bourantas CV, Papafaklis MI, Lakkas L, Sakellarios A, Onuma Y, Zhang YJ, Muramatsu T, Diletti R, Bizopoulos P, Kalatzis F, Naka KK, Fotiadis DI, Wang J, Garcia Garcia HM, Kimura T, Michalis LK, Serruys PW. Fusion of optical coherence tomographic and angiographic data for more accurate evaluation of the endothelial shear stress patterns and neointimal distribution after bioresorbable scaffold implantation: Comparison with intravascular ultrasound-derived reconstructions. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging. 2014

  28. Pant S, Bressloff NW, Forrester AI, Curzen N. The influence of strut-connectors in stented vessels: A comparison of pulsatile flow through five coronary stents. Annals of biomedical engineering. 2010;38:1893-1907

  29. Papafaklis MI, Bourantas CV, Yonetsu T, Vergallo R, Kotsia A, Nakatani S, Lakkas LS, Athanasiou LS, Naka KK, Fotiadis DI, Feldman CL, Stone PH, Serruys PW, Jang IK, Michalis LK. Anatomically correct three-dimensional coronary artery reconstruction using frequency domain optical coherence tomographic and angiographic data: Head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound for endothelial shear stress assessment in humans. EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2015;11:407-415

  30. Erne P, Schier M, Resink TJ. The road to bioabsorbable stents: Reaching clinical reality? Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. 2006;29:11-16

  31. Bruining N, Tanimoto S, Otsuka M, Weustink A, Ligthart J, de Winter S, van Mieghem C, Nieman K, de Feyter PJ, van Domburg RT, Serruys PW. Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a bioabsorbable poly-l-lactic acid stent design in the acute phase: A comparison between 2- and 3d-qca, qcu and qmsct-ca. EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2008;4:285-291

  32. Wiebe J, Nef HM, Hamm CW. Current status of bioresorbable scaffolds in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014;64:2541-2551

  33. Wittchow E, Adden N, Riedmuller J, Savard C, Waksman R, Braune M. Bioresorbable drug-eluting magnesium-alloy scaffold: Design and feasibility in a porcine coronary model. EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2013;8:1441-1450

  34. Gutierrez-Chico JL, Serruys PW, Girasis C, Garg S, Onuma Y, Brugaletta S, Garcia-Garcia H, van Es GA, Regar E. Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: A head-to-head comparison between qca, ivus and oct. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging. 2012;28:467-478

  35. Sihan K, Botha C, Post F, de Winter S, Gonzalo N, Regar E, Serruys PJ, Hamers R, Bruining N. Fully automatic three-dimensional quantitative analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography: Method and validation. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2009;74:1058-1065

  36. Serruys PW, Ormiston JA, Onuma Y, Regar E, Gonzalo N, Garcia-Garcia HM, Nieman K, Bruining N, Dorange C, Miquel-Hebert K, Veldhof S, Webster M, Thuesen L, Dudek D. A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system (absorb): 2-year outcomes and results from multiple imaging methods. Lancet. 2009;373:897-910

  37. Bruining N, de Winter S, Roelandt JR, Regar E, Heller I, van Domburg RT, Hamers R, Onuma Y, Dudek D, Webster MW, Thuesen L, Ormiston JA, Cheong WF, Miquel-Hebert K, Veldhof S, Serruys PW. Monitoring in vivo absorption of a drug-eluting bioabsorbable stent with intravascular ultrasound-derived parameters a feasibility study. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. 2010;3:449-456

  38. Sarno G, Bruining N, Onuma Y, Garg S, Brugaletta S, De Winter S, Regar E, Thuesen L, Dudek D, Veldhof S, Dorange C, Garcia-Garcia HM, Ormiston JA, Serruys PW. Morphological and functional evaluation of the bioresorption of the bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold using ivus, echogenicity and vasomotion testing at two year follow-up: A patient level insight into the absorb a clinical trial. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging. 2012;28:51-58

  39. Waksman R, Prati F, Bruining N, Haude M, Bose D, Kitabata H, Erne P, Verheye S, Degen H, Vermeersch P, Di Vito L, Koolen J, Erbel R. Serial observation of drug-eluting absorbable metal scaffold: Multi-imaging modality assessment. Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions. 2013;6:644-653

  40. Shin ES, Garcia-Garcia HM, Garg S, Ligthart J, Thuesen L, Dudek D, Ormiston JA, Serruys PW. Assessment of the serial changes of vessel wall contents in atherosclerotic coronary lesion with bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffolds using shin’s method: An ivus study. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging. 2011;27:931-937

  41. Brugaletta S, Gomez-Lara J, Garcia-Garcia HM, Heo JH, Farooq V, van Geuns RJ, Chevalier B, Windecker S, McClean D, Thuesen L, Whitbourn R, Meredith I, Dorange C, Veldhof S, Rapoza R, Ormiston JA, Serruys PW. Analysis of 1 year virtual histology changes in coronary plaque located behind the struts of the everolimus eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging. 2012;28:1307-1314

  42. Chandrana C, Kharin N, Vince G, Roy S, Fleischman A. Demonstration of second-harmonic ivus feasibility with focused broadband miniature transducers. IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control. 2010;57:1077-1085

  43. Tu S, Xu L, Ligthart J, Xu B, Witberg K, Sun Z, Koning G, Reiber JH, Regar E. In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3d) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging. 2012;28:1315-1327

  44. Gurmeric S, Isguder GG, Carlier S, Unal G. A new 3-d automated computational method to evaluate in-stent neointimal hyperplasia in in-vivo intravascular optical coherence tomography pullbacks. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 2009;12:776-785

  45. Athanasiou LS, Bourantas CV, Rigas G, Sakellarios AI, Exarchos TP, Siogkas PK, Ricciardi A, Naka KK, Papafaklis MI, Michalis LK, Prati F, Fotiadis DI. Meth


Nico Bruining
Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands..
Elzbieta Pociask
AGH University of Science and Technology, Krakow, Poland. Krakow Cardiovascular Research Institute, Krakow, Poland..
Klaudia Proniewska
Department of Biophysics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland. Krakow Cardiovascular Research Institute, Krakow, Poland..

Autor correspondencia

Nico Bruining
Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands..

Correo electrónico: n.bruining@erasmusmc.nl

Para descargar el PDF del artículo
The potential role of intracoronary imaging at the dawn of the fourth revolution in Interventional Cardiology

Haga click aquí

Para descargar el PDF de la revista completa
Revista Argentina de Cardioangiología intervencionista, Volumen Año 2016 Num 01

Haga click aquí

Revista Argentina de Cardioangiología intervencionista
Número 01 | Volumen 6 | Año 2016

The potential role of intracoronary imaging at the dawn of the fourth revolution in Interventional Cardiology

Nico Bruining, Elzbieta Pociask, Klaudia Proniewska

Revista Argentina de Cardioangiología intervencionista

Colegio Argentino de Cardioangiólogos Intervencionistas

Fecha de publicación

Registro de propiedad intelectual
© Colegio Argentino de Cardioangiólogos Intervencionistas

Reciba la revista gratis en su correo

Suscribase gratis a nuestra revista y recibala en su correo antes de su publicacion impresa.

Colegio Argentino de Cardioangiólogos Intervencionistas
Viamonte 2146 6° (C1056ABH) Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires | Argentina | tel./fax +54 11 4952-2117 / 4953-7310 | e-mail revista@caci.org.ar | www.caci.org.ar

Colegio Argentino de Cardioangiólogos Intervencionistas | ISSN 2250-7531 | ISSN digital 2313-9307

La plataforma Meducatium es un proyecto editorial de Publicaciones Latinoamericanas S.R.L.
Piedras 1333 2° C (C1240ABC) Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires | Argentina | tel./fax (5411) 4362-1600 | e-mail info@publat.com.ar | www.publat.com.ar

Meducatium versión ST